As long as technology continues to shorten our memory it will remain valuable.
Any concerted effort to get better at hitting the ‘off’ button and walking away pays high-value dividends in life, love, productivity and humor.
The driving force behind all technological invention is the premise that, “technology can do things better than humans”. That may be true if the neo-technologists are looking to build cooperative technologies but what about competitive ones. Baked into the premise are competitive presumptions, one we cannot do for ourselves, that’s demoralizing and two that we should be replaced. It seems technologists are claimi9ng to know the mind of the superior way, the path that will free our selves from these earth-bound limitations. Let me think, where have I heard that before?
This would support the main thesis that we should be asking, more importantly who’s going to build the technologies? Besides the obvious Ouroboros situation created by such egotistical nonsense I don’t believe technology itself is insidious, though it has been proven to be an effective tool for those who are. The technologists are making a classic blunder, trying to remove humans from the equation.
Technologists are not unlike many others driven by their egos over the centuries. In our case, in this time, creating a machine that can replace a human is so sought after the seekers do not realize they’re working to replace themselves, truly a slave’s journey.
There is another side I would like to share, another side you never see. I believe technology needs humans. I believe technology is lost without us. I believe technology is lonely. It’s like the kid who’s relatively new and wants to fit in, trying to get along with everyone. Awkward and jittery, like the kid who laughs too loud at his own jokes and thinks someone else’s pain is a chance to gossip. The kind of kid who despite the boasting is constantly receiving praise and amazement from every direction, hailed and lauded over without ever having to struggle to earn a place, face its checkered reputation or achieve a sense of worth among others.
We all know where this kind of imbalanced relationship leads. When despair brought on by excessive loneliness is the format new truths must be continually created so that the false front, the empty core remains out of sight. In fact if you were to see the type of life technology lives it would flat out break your heart. A one room, below ground apartment, heavy motel drapes drawn, strewn with piles of unfinished notions, unresolved intentions and the combined smells of mismatched secondhand furniture that have built up cleaning solvents of every kind.
We have all felt and witnessed how technology has distorted our ideas of work, connecting, friendships, communicating and sharing. I would argue that to a great extent technology has distorted our understanding of ideas themselves. Once tech firms realized the problem with the internet was you have to go home to use it they built an operating system into cell phones. They behaved as though they were gifting us access to the world by putting a computer in our pockets.
Imagine if a Cuisinart food processor or a Dyson vacuum were to be built on such undelivered promises. Imaging if a car company said, “Listen, we know the brakes aren’t working so well but next month we’re coming out with a brake upgrade that’ll really stop your car”. They’d continue, “… by the way it doesn’t go on all roads but don’t worry we’ve placed signs so you know which roads to take”. We wouldn’t put up with that for a second.
We are the ones who’ve given technology a pass that we would never allow other makers of products to get away with. Tech companies put out products that are unfounded and untested, except by the already converted and people can’t stop talking about them. So why the pass, why are we so willing to let them off the hook? Are we so enamored, so seduced by technology that we just want to own the latest? Are we afraid we’ll get left behind, called old fashioned, miss out out on being part of the ultra-connected? I would answer yes, yes and yes.
If one stops to think about it for a moment and recall the not too distant memory of having original thoughts and feelings with decisions appearing from within as genuine emotion, well, suddenly the phone with the computer in it seems silly, self aggrandizing and at its best an entertaining distraction.
David Moore dmoore@zero-nine.com
Website: www.zero-nine.com